The ABCE countries might try to gaslight us, but the Summary of Observation Reports prepared by GECOM CEO Keith Lowenfield is damming. It has obliterated their claim about the PPP having won credible elections, and reveal their stance for what it is, an attempt at regime change. Some time in the future this report, and the stance of the ABCE countries, will be taught in democracy classes as a classic example of attempted regime change by trying to legitimize fraudulent elections.
The report prepared by Keith Lowenfield details the crime, evidence of the crime, and the myriad attempts to cover-up the crime. The report records 4,373 cases of voter impersonation, which is the crime. Everything else, including failure to administer Oaths of Identity, missing Oaths of Identity, poll books, counterfoils etc, are either evidence of the crime or efforts to cover up the crime. We must focus on the crime.
However, when we look at the 4,373 unearthed cases of voter impersonation we must understand that this is evidence that a voter impersonation operation was carried out. It is not a total recording of said operation. So then, what does 4,373 incidents of voter impersonation really mean?
To appreciate the answer we must first understand that no political party runs a voter impersonation campaign to cast vote for the dead and the migrated. The intent is to cast votes for the delinquent, unenthusiastic, and indiscipline traditional supporters who are in the country but for one reason or an other did not turn up to vote. This is about 15% of our bloated list, but would be 25% of a clean list. Therefore, the PPP voter impersonation campaign was set up to target 15% of the list at each polling station where it was in operation.
So what does 4,373 incidents of votes being cast for the dead and the migrated mean. It means the PPP made 4,373 mistakes during their voter impersonation operation. It was not their intention to vote for the dead and migrated. They intended to vote for the delinquent, unenthusiastic and indiscipline. For each mistake there were probably nine perfect hits. That is to say, there are 4,373 x 10, or 43,730 fraudulent votes in the PPP column. It is not rocket science, absent voter impersonation, the PPP would have lost the elections by at least 25,000 votes.
The report prepared by Keith Lowenfield establishes that the recount tabulation is not an expression of the will of the people. We must revert to the original declarations, establish a government of national unity, and prepare for new elections.